systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Lennart Poettering]

On Tue, 24.08.10 15:55, Matthew Miller (mattdm at mattdm.org) wrote:

> 
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:33:50PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > What would make sense to add to chkconfig is something that checks
> > whether a systemd unit is installed and then prints "Hey, you have a
> > systemd unit installed, chkconfig won't do what you think it will do for
> > this unit" or so.
> 
> This is a very big change. chkconfig has worked for a long, long time. Its
> elegance and simplicity is one of the nice administrative features of Red
> Hat based distributes. People like it.

Yes, and they should continue to use it -- for sysv scripts.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.