systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[Matthew Miller]

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:32:32PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > This isn't personal. It's a list of requirements that indicate where we need
> > to be in order to ship systemd as the default in Fedora 14. It doesn't
> > matter whose "fault" it is -- if it doesn't work, we can't ship it
> > broken.
> Great, I geuss I'll become an X hacker then. Apparently if KMS is borked
> it's now my duty to fix it. Yay!

I just said it wasn't. 

But let me also repeat my the next paragraph, which you left out:

> Obviously if the item in question fails both with systemd and upstart,
> it's a different sort of blocker.


-- 
Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org>
Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services
Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences