systemd acceptance, packaging guidelines (was Re: systemd and changes)

[drago01]

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:35 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>
>> Indeed, imo we should add them to the release criteria.
>
> It's a rather indigestible lump, for the criteria. James and I were
> thinking about a 'module' system for the release criteria so it can link
> out to other pages, but I'm wondering when a dilution effect would start
> kicking in. I'm not sure everything on that list is genuinely something
> we'd hold up a release for, either. But it's certainly something I want
> to use for the systemd test day.

Well I am not saying "go add the whole list" ... but at least a subset of it.
Having a working initsystem should be release goal imo (where working
is more than just "it boots").