old_testing_critpath notifications

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Dec 2 18:43:00 UTC 2010


On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 19:19 +0100, Till Maas wrote:

> A big difference is that the testing process is very fuzzy and there is
> not much tooling that helps people to test unknown software. E.g. if I
> want to review a package, there are several checklists I could use and
> there are guidelines that I can easily follow to perform a review. But
> testing software is not that easy.

That's one thing we'll be working on this cycle.

> Also it is not possible to partly test updates and share the effort.
> E.g. in reviews everyone can comment to get the package in shape if it
> is not.

Non-numeric Bodhi feedback will help with that. (Luke, in case you
didn't get the hint yet...we really need that non-numeric Bodhi
feedback :>)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list