Unresponsive maintainer for libical

[Debarshi Ray]

> I know I'm not following the NonResponsiveMaintainer policy closely, but
> I believe, in this particular case, it would be with no gain.
>
> I'm fine to take ownership of the libical package and do releases for
> it.

I am orphaning it in PackageDB. Please take up ownership.

Thanks,
Debarshi


-- 
The camera is to the brush what Java is to assembly.
   -- Sougata Santra