Is there any value to per-Fedora branch ACLs?

[Till Maas]

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:20:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a
> question.
> 
> Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per
> Fedora branch?  I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there
> real value in ACLs for f13, f14, devel, etc...?

There should be at least a distinction between EOL releases and non EOL
releases, e.g. someone having only commit access for F12 must not have
commit access for F13+ currently, because usually only ownership / ACLs
for current Fedora releases are up to date in PackageDB. And there
should still be a distinction in PackageDB for different
(co)maintainer for different Fedora releases.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101207/3523f5b7/attachment.bin