ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

[Jiri Moskovcak]

On 12/13/2010 02:17 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 01:14 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> On Thursday, December 09, 2010 06:24:15 pm Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>> On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>>>> so, can we call the RFE: "attach backtrace even when dupe is found" ?
>>>>
>>>> or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if current
>>>> backtrace is better than any already attached to the bug*'.
>>>
>>> Adam, that would require downloading all the bt from the bugzilla to the
>>> user and do some comparing on his side (this would be nice to have in
>>> bz) ... but it is doable...
>>
>> Inspire from Dr. Konqui again ;-) They have very nice system to pre-detect
>> possible dups in bz, you can compare your backtraces, set if it's a duplicate
>> for sure or it's possible duplicate etc. It really works! At least for a little
>> bit advanced users - it filtered 90% of reports of my crashes ;-)
>>
>> R.
>
> - AFAIK it's implemented server side ... so nothing ABRT can do... we
> have tools to find possible dupes client side, but it takes few hours to
> download all the backtraces from bz to compare it...
> - but yes, it would be nice to have such feature in our bz...
>

btw, kklic is working on those scripts to make them more user friendly 
and will make them available - especially triaggers might find them 
useful...

J.

>>
>>> J.
>>
>