noexec on /dev/shm

[Lennart Poettering]

On Tue, 14.12.10 18:22, Miloslav Trmač (mitr at volny.cz) wrote:

> Bill Nottingham píše v Út 14. 12. 2010 v 12:08 -0500:
> > > The problem is not the technical solution. Problem is that changes of
> > > such important thing like /etc/fstab are decided without Fedora developers.
> > 
> > Eh, what? It's a change to how API filesystems (/proc, /sys, etc.) get
> > mounted. When this was done in rc.sysinit, every change to how it mounted
> > /proc wasn't discussed on the devel list. When we switched to having dracut
> > be the primary way that API filesystems are mounted, that wasn't put up
> > to a FESCo vote. 
> The practical difference is that nothing broke at that time, whereas
> systemd tends to break thinks that users use. (I won't buy dismissing it
> as "mere bugs" - adding NOEXEC could hardly have been a typo.)
> 	Mirek
> 

"tends to break"? On what is that founded? Have you filed bugs?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.