How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

Mat Booth fedora at
Mon Feb 1 20:22:19 UTC 2010

On 1 February 2010 19:23, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth <fedora at> wrote:
>> On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers <mike at> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +0000, Mat Booth wrote:
>>>> Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like
>>>> a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain.
>>> Running a fully updated system, I upgraded to firefox-3.6 in rawhide
>>> today, and it only updated 3 (firefox, xulrunner, and some other that I
>>> don't recall) and everything working just fine.
>> For now...
>> Really, you should be using Remi's repository. He has a build of 3.6 for F12:
>> But you mistook my comment. That comment was in reference to
>> maintaining two versions of xulrunner.
> These RPMS still appear to be using an internal copy of libogg and
> libtheora which is currently identical to upstream code which is
> already shipped in Fedora.

Well, you either want Firefox 3.6 or you don't.

I'm not advocating using a package that's not shipped by the distro,
just pointing out where the best (IMHO) place to get it from is, if
you wanted it.

Mat Booth

More information about the devel mailing list