Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)

James Antill james at fedoraproject.org
Mon Feb 1 20:38:38 UTC 2010


On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:33 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:04 +0000, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 29 January 2010 17:00, Pierre-Yves <pingou at pingoured.fr> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >> Here's where it gets weird:
> > >> 0.6.10-1 then 0.6.10-2 then 0.6.9-4 then 0.6.9-2 seems an arbitrary
> > >> ordering:
> > > It is only weird/inverted when the date are the same.
> > >
> > > Pierre
> > > --
> > > devel mailing list
> > > devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > >
> > 
> > See this thread:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-devel-list@redhat.com/msg04173.html
> > 
> Thanks; for reference the closest I can see to a bug report about this
> seems to be bulletpoint 2 within
> http://yum.baseurl.org/ticket/7#comment:1
> 
> (sorry; doomed with other stuff right now and thus unable to fix this
> myself).

 I've fixed this in upstream yum, so it should be fixed for rawhide when
yum is next updated there (other releases are likely to stay "broken"
long term).

 For the gory details:

http://yum.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=yum.git;a=commit;h=83ea015350e40b11013dd8d03f07558ea4f4cad9



More information about the devel mailing list