Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)

Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at
Tue Feb 2 10:35:48 UTC 2010

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> That is your interpretation. I see nothing on this page to support this
> claim. And actually it is contrary to format #3 logic, since its main
> difference with other changelog formats is that the version is not part of
> the entry header, so there's no reason to limit one entry to one version

It's blatantly obvious that all these formats have one thing in common: 
there's one entry per new EVR. Our automated tools (e.g. make clog as 
already pointed out by Michael Schwendt) also expect that. But I guess I'll 
need to get the FPC to officially clarify this.

        Kevin Kofler

More information about the devel mailing list