Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

[David Nalley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Mike McGrath  wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.10)

iEYEARECAAYFAktoWG8ACgkQkZOYj+cNI1d6MwCeOBegidrasLG6OgROhPdR1sRd
MtUAnjMVImF7vKuZLX9Oi78Rvc+gDUo0
=5y4r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<snip>
> And to answer your question about what "isnt' broken".  I suggest you look
> at our http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics page.  We've only seen
> growth in 2 of our last 6 releases.  Think about that.


Is that how we measure success??
I am not suggesting it should or shouldn't be, but what is the measure
of success for Fedora?
I'd likely argue that's probably about as varied as the goals of contributors.