Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

Matthew Garrett mjg59 at
Tue Feb 2 20:27:23 UTC 2010

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:

> I think the responsibility of these things should be placed upon the
> SIG members who perform the functions from within these different
> groups. Why not have a QA person from each SIG work together with the
> larger QA efforts instead of potentially against them?

If a spin wants to use a modified kernel package, what's the procedure 
for ensuring that it receives the same level of QA as the normal kernel?

Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at

More information about the devel mailing list