Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Tue Feb 2 20:27:23 UTC 2010
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> I think the responsibility of these things should be placed upon the
> SIG members who perform the functions from within these different
> groups. Why not have a QA person from each SIG work together with the
> larger QA efforts instead of potentially against them?
If a spin wants to use a modified kernel package, what's the procedure
for ensuring that it receives the same level of QA as the normal kernel?
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the devel