FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
tmraz at redhat.com
Tue Feb 2 20:30:44 UTC 2010
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 20:13 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:28:11AM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > I am sorry, but I do not see a real need for special guideline for the
> > fipscheck checksums. The policy where these checksums should/will be
> > placed should be decided by the fipscheck package itself. Of course I
> As soon as multiple packages are affected, there should be a guideline
> to document how something needs to be done to work, e.g. if someone
> wants to package a new software that contains fips checksums.
Huh, shouldn't reading documentation in fipscheck package be
Of course the documentation in the fipscheck package has to be changed
to reflect the change.
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
More information about the devel