Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

Adam Miller maxamillion at
Tue Feb 2 20:34:06 UTC 2010

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at> wrote:
> QA is a particular skill set, not every sig has a QA member and requiring
> it wouldn't work either.  I feel it's like assuming that just because I've
> done turbogears apps that someone would ask me to do CSS as well.  I don't
> think it's safe to assume that because someone can put a spin together
> that they have the tools and knowledge to do proper QA on it.
>        -Mike
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at

I'm not saying that it should be a requirement of a SIG, but if it
truly hits a point where it is not manageable from a QA standpoint to
support all ends of the Fedora project then things will have to take a
more granular approach and the QA project themselves will have to
scope out what they will and won't work on and I imagine the
SIGs/Spins will be first on the chopping block (and rightfully so).


()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\   - against proprietary attachments

More information about the devel mailing list