Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
notting at redhat.com
Wed Feb 3 19:11:35 UTC 2010
Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler at chello.at) said:
> John Poelstra wrote:
> > I guess what I'm trying to get at here is that we've posted all meeting
> > recaps to advisory-board list and there has been ZERO discussion or
> > inquiries there. We specifically asked for feedback to the original
> > list of "unanswered questions" on advisory-board. Is there a particular
> > reason you did not respond there?
> Probably because it's yet another mailing list most maintainers don't read?
The devel list is for development of the distribution; advisory-board is for
project-wide direction. While there's certainly overlap with the devel list
for this, advisory-board is the far more appropriate place for issues of
More information about the devel