Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Feb 3 21:28:29 UTC 2010
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 22:19 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> A side-effect, is that spec parsers that read the file in a buildroot
> which is missing the package providing the macro, will sometimes think
> the macro call is part of the subpackage %summary. This is
> but I don't see how to avoid it without making another part of the
> harder for us.
So long as it doesn't disrupt what is viewed as the summary from the
srpm stored in Koji, I think you'll be fine.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100203/09082ac1/attachment.bin
More information about the devel