ABRT unusable again
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Sun Feb 7 18:46:23 UTC 2010
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Secondly, the package maintainer should be informed about what is broken
> with the chosen/packaged software release. Certainly you don't ask for
> upstream to filter out *all* reports from all distributions, to return
> distribution-specific ones into a dist's own bug tracking system,
Most problems are not distribution-specific. For the ones which are, they
can close the bugs as DOWNSTREAM, NOTOURBUG or whatever their Bugzilla uses
for that case and tell the user to report them to the distribution. It's
less work for them do to that for the few bugs which happen to be
distribution-specific than for us to do the opposite for the common case.
> and to work on incomplete backtraces or problems that aren't trivial to
> reproduce in the absence of the original bug reporter.
That's why bugs should not be forwarded by us, but filed directly upstream.
> Fedora packages are not fire'n'forget releases.
Once upstream fixes the issue (which will result in bugmail to the
reporter), it's OK to file a bug to us asking us to backport the fix. But if
the package is maintained properly (like e.g. KDE), the next release with
the fix will be pushed soon anyway.
More information about the devel