No lzma sdk in fedora

[Chen Lei]

 In fact libarchive doesn't require lzma-libs any more in F12 and F13. 
For F11:
repoquery --whatrequires libarchive.so.2
PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.9-1.fc11.i586
libarchive-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586
kdeutils-6:4.2.2-4.fc11.i586
PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.6-8.fc11.i586
libarchive-devel-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586
Updating libarchive to the F12 only affects a few stuffs(soname unchanged). 


在2010-02-13?01:02:56，"Milos?Jakubicek"?<xjakub at fi.muni.cz>?写道：
>Hi?Chen,
>
>On?12.2.2010?12:50,?Chen?Lei?wrote:
>>?I?realized?from?"http://tukaani.org/xz/"??the?core?of?the?xz?utils
>>?compression?code?is?based?on?LZMA?SDK?<http://7-zip.org/sdk.html>,?but
>>?it?has?been?modified?quite?a?lot?to?be?suitable?for?XZ?Utils.
>>?So?I?think?we?should?ship?lzma?sdk?for?fedora?in?parallel?with?xz?utils
>>?and?p7zip.?Since?xz?utils?are?the?successor?to?lzma?utils,?maybe?lzma
>>?utils?can?be?safely?retired?in?fedora.
>
>Retiring?lzma?(completely)?is?a?long-term?plan,?yes?(I'm?the?maintainer?
>of?it).?Not?sure?about?the?right?time?--?F14?
>
>I'll?talk?to?the?libarchive?maintainer?--?any?other?objections?against?
>the?plan?to?retire?lzma?for?F14?
>
>Milos


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100213/9f3a7b51/attachment.html