No lzma sdk in fedora
xjakub at fi.muni.cz
Fri Feb 12 18:10:23 UTC 2010
Oh, I didn't really notice how your repoquery looks like before.
Libarchive is ok, but there are others:
>repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps lzma lzma-libs lzma-devel
...which need to be sorted out.
CC'ing autoarchive, man and rpm maintainers:
Ivana, Panu, Fabian: are your packages able to use xz instead?
(I guess in case of rpm this is just a relict, right?)
In all cases the lzma dependency is hardcoded, can hopefully be just
If yes, I can retire lzma as soon as we branch F13.
On 12.2.2010 18:35, Chen Lei wrote:
> In fact libarchive doesn't require lzma-libs any more in F12 and F13.
> For F11:
> repoquery --whatrequires libarchive.so.2
> Updating libarchive to the F12 only affects a few stuffs(soname unchanged).
> ÔÚ2010-02-13 01:02:56£¬"Milos Jakubicek" <xjakub at fi.muni.cz <mailto:xjakub at fi.muni.cz>> Ð´µÀ£º
>>On 12.2.2010 12:50, Chen Lei wrote:
>>> I realized from "http://tukaani.org/xz/" the core of the xz utils
>>> compression code is based on LZMA SDK <http://7-zip.org/sdk.html>, but
>>> it has been modified quite a lot to be suitable for XZ Utils.
>>> So I think we should ship lzma sdk for fedora in parallel with xz utils
>>> and p7zip. Since xz utils are the successor to lzma utils, maybe lzma
>>> utils can be safely retired in fedora.
>>Retiring lzma (completely) is a long-term plan, yes (I'm the maintainer
>>of it). Not sure about the right time -- F14?
>>I'll talk to the libarchive maintainer -- any other objections against
>>the plan to retire lzma for F14?
More information about the devel