Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64
Matt_Domsch at dell.com
Sat Feb 13 20:35:55 UTC 2010
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:53:20PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> >> using rawhide from 2010-02-10
> >> This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed.
> >> This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. ??See
> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking for
> >> further details.
> > I'm mass-filing bugs right now. ??The ones failing for Implicit DSO
> > Linking will block 564245, which itself blocks F13FTBFS. ??All other
> > failures will block F13FTBFS as usual.
> > If you've fixed your packages since 2/10, you can simply close your
> > bugs CLOSED RAWHIDE.
> If you file a bug against a package that is not broken (anymore),
> shouldn't that be CLOSED NOTABUG? :)
> Anyway, I came to my attention that there are false alarms such as:
> Is there a way to filter these out automatically or do we have to do it by hand?
I duped that bug into a mock bug, 565223. I don't know why it's
failing, but it did so at least twice...
Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
More information about the devel