Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote:
> > > 
> > > > sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt
> > > 
> > > How is package ownership determined? I have nothing to do anymore with
> > > Sylpheed for F-13 or F-12.
> > >
> > Just a guess -- it's taking people in all of the non-EOL branches.  Which
> > means that F-11 is why you're on this list.
> 
> This is what I use:
> 
> function get_owners()
> {
>     URL='https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugzilla?tg_format=plain'
>     OUTPUT=~/owners.list
> 
>     curl -u ${FASUSER}:${FASPASS} -F user_name=${FASUSER} \
>     -F password=${FASPASS} -F login=Login "$URL" | \
>      grep "^Fedora|" > ${OUTPUT}
> }
> 
> It's not restricted by branch.  Should it be, and if so, what syntax?

That URL is the same I user for the broken deps reports, of course.
Haven't thought about that.

Hmm, bugzilla doesn't handle a different owner per "Product Version"
either, does it?

So, the fine-grained options in pkgdb don't map into bugzilla, ... and
not into the foo-owner email aliases either. That implies that package
co-maintainers for old branches receive all bugzilla mail plus additional
reports even if it's not about their branch.