Name that Tree!
awilliam at redhat.com
Sun Feb 14 08:00:41 UTC 2010
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:48 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 21:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't
> > really need to have its own name that's always the same...
> Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk about things in "13" before 13
> is released, and when we're trying to express how things work in the as
> of yet unreleased tree that is fedora 13, it gets pretty wordy.
I guess I just don't quite see that. Why's it awkward?
> Right now the docs read like "The Pending Fedora 13 repo" or "things go
> into Pending for Fedora 13", that's the term we want to adjust. We have
Why can't you just say 'The Fedora 13 repo' and 'things go into Fedora
13'? As others have said, this is how Ubuntu does it and it seems to
work fine there.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the devel