Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Feb 15 15:26:25 UTC 2010

On 02/15/2010 02:28 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/15/2010 01:48 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:49:47AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 02/15/2010 11:00 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>>>> Following the steps from deltarpm example
>>>> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange#Example_deltarpm)
>>>> helps me to reproduce the DSO issue in local mock.
>> This would have been necessary before the Feb 9, which is when the new
>> linker made it into rawhide.  I specifically started my run on Feb 10
>> after ensuring that the new linker was in rawhide, and that my copy of
>> the tree was up-to-date, including that linker.
> Which version of binutils exactly have you been using?
> I noticed my rawhide mock caches contain
> binutils-
> while download.fedora.redhat.com carries
> binutils-
> For reasons I don't yet now, mock doesn't install this (latest) version,
> so I am ending up with the *13.binutils (likely a version predating the
> chains)
> =>  I am inclined to think something is broken with the repos, their
> mirrors or with mock.

Meanwhile I rebuilt my rawhide-mock from scatch (rm -rf /var/cache/mock) 
and observed this:

- mock traversed 45 rawhide mirrors it considered to be broken before 
finding one it considered "current".

- now my mock picked up binutils*-15.fc13

- I still can't locally reproduce the FTBS breakdown.


More information about the devel mailing list