Fedora 13 has been branched!!

[Till Maas]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:40:15PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Till Maas wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:28:37PM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> >
> >> Take KDE for example: Although the KDE SIG is doing a great job in
> >> avoiding breakdowns, I doubt that each and every maintainer of a QT or
> >> KDE app is always aware of the changes before they happen. If things
> >> still seem to be working in F-13 or rawhide, he might not even be aware
> >> of the custom tag.
> > 
> > Yes, I know, because I co-maintain a package using qt and I recently
> > read something from the maintainer that he can not push a bugfix update
> > to stable, because a qt override is in the buildroot.
> 
> The solution there is to talk to us, we can get the Qt 4.6 stuff off the 
> buildroot for a while so he can build his bugfix update. That's what 
> #fedora-kde is for. (IRC is the best communication method for this stuff 
> because it's real time, please use it!)

I'll remember this. But why don't you use a special tag for this instead
of a buildroot override? I believe this question is not answered and I
even might have asked it once in IRC. ;-)

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100218/6f981ec0/attachment-0001.bin