2010-02-19 - Fedora 13 Alpha blocker bug review Recap

[Adam Williamson]

We held the third blocker bug review of the Fedora 13 cycle today. A
couple of sticky issues, but overall things are looking good. We
reviewed all open Alpha blocker bugs. Thanks to all who attended. The
summary of the meeting can be found here: 

http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-02-19/fedora-bugzappers.2010-02-19-16.03.htmlhttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-02-05/alphablocker1.2010-02-05-16.05.html

Reproduced below for convenience:

=================================================================
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 13 Alpha blocker bug review meeting #3
=================================================================

Meeting summary
---------------
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386  (adamw, 16:05:24)
  * AGREED: 557386 is back with abrt team but probably depends on 566460
    (adamw, 16:18:19)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566460  (adamw, 16:18:30)
  * AGREED: suspending discussion on 566460 while we wait for nhorman
    (adamw, 16:20:31)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560477  (adamw, 16:20:33)
  * AGREED: 560477 is probably fixed, waiting for next anaconda build to
    confirm fix  (adamw, 16:24:22)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562209  (adamw, 16:24:33)
  * AGREED: resuming 566460 discussion  (adamw, 16:25:27)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566460  (adamw, 16:25:33)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/13   (adamw, 16:31:38)
  * AGREED: kklic is checking out 566460, going to discuss another bug
    for now  (adamw, 16:47:56)

* 562209  (adamw, 16:47:59)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566460  (adamw, 16:48:21)
  * AGREED: 566460 should be a blocker, must be fixed kernel side,
    nhorman will try and fix it in time to be tested before go/no-go
    (adamw, 16:53:23)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562209  (adamw, 16:54:36)
  * AGREED: 562209 for now will be handled by having urlgrabber be able
    to reinit connections, skvidal will work on this, clumens and jlaska
    will test  (adamw, 17:13:13)
  * AGREED: post-alpha a more 'correct' fix may be put in place  (adamw,
    17:13:38)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563212  (adamw, 17:16:52)
  * AGREED: 563212 is fixed, closing  (adamw, 17:21:28)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565306  (adamw, 17:21:58)
  * AGREED: 565306 should be fixed in next anaconda drop, jlaska will
    test  (adamw, 17:25:08)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565497  (adamw, 17:25:10)
  * AGREED: 565306 is fixed by updated totem-pl-parser, closing  (adamw,
    17:27:28)

* 565592, 565599, 565611, 565639, 565840, 565873  (adamw, 17:30:38)
  * AGREED: these are all anaconda bugs which have been patched but no
    new anaconda build has been made to test them yet  (adamw, 17:30:53)
  * AGREED: we will re-test and confirm the fixes after the next
    anaconda drop  (adamw, 17:31:13)

* open floor  (adamw, 17:31:19)

Meeting ended at 17:39:37 UTC.




Action Items
------------





Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (150)
* jlaska (58)
* nhorman (42)
* jeff_hann (25)
* skvidal (25)
* Oxf13 (13)
* clumens (8)
* maxamillion (7)
* kklic (6)
* wwoods (4)
* zodbot (2)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net