fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Fri Feb 26 08:55:40 UTC 2010

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:29:31PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or worse?

It makes it harder to run repoquery against rawhide, because one would
need to adjust the releasever value everytime rawhide is branched. But
if --releasever=rawhide worked, then this would be better than having to
install the rawhide-release package.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/7ca81917/attachment.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list