FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 14:59:59 UTC 2010


On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > The possibility to publish hot-fixes is most important.
> 
> +1. Not being able to push those out quickly would really suck. 

What sucks more is recent "hot-fixes" which were even more broken than
the issue they were trying to fix.  They were pushed directly to stable
and broke a significant number of systems because of a scenario the
maintainer didn't imagine or test.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/2d8f1131/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list