FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 15:46:58 UTC 2010

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 16:23 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Because EPEL has to be very stable, so additional time spent in testing is
> even better, for example for reasons you highlight below. I never said 
> that packages should not go through testing in EPEL! But Fedora is another 
> thing. 

The conclusion here is that it's OK for Fedora to be broken and unstable
in it's releases.  I call bullshit.  It is very much not OK for this to

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/1fc78688/attachment-0001.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list