FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Matthew Garrett]

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:40:46PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> That was my suggestion. All I got was negative comments (AIUI, nobody else 
> wanted anything less than a majority of FESCo to be able to approve direct 
> stable pushes, at least nobody said otherwise in the meeting), and even 
> outright accusations of proposing ad personam rules:
> [begin quote (from the meeting log)]
> Feb 23 21:58:17 <notting>	Kevin_Kofler: of course you'd say 1 FESCo 
> member, becuase from your statements, it sounds like you would intentionally 
> sabotage the process and approve everything
> [end quote]

Notting's statement was in response to your earlier:

23-02-2010 20:48:05 <Kevin_Kofler>: OK by 1 rel-eng member would be fine 
with me (I could just bug rdieter ;-)

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org