fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.
Bill Nottingham
notting at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 16:42:46 UTC 2010
Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 16:29 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or
> > worse?
>
> I muffed up fedora-release on rawhide, but here was my plan.
>
> rawhide:
> fedora-release requires fedora-release-rawhide
> All repos except for rawhide disabled. Rawhide enabled.
> This state never changes, the only thing that changes is package
> version goes up each time we branch. 13, 14, 15, etc...
How about just have fedora-release contain only the rawhide
repo, and have 'Obsoletes: fedora-release-rawhide < %{version}'?
Bill
More information about the devel
mailing list