fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 16:42:46 UTC 2010

Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said: 
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 16:29 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or
> > worse?
> I muffed up fedora-release on rawhide, but here was my plan.
> rawhide:
>   fedora-release requires fedora-release-rawhide
>   All repos except for rawhide disabled.  Rawhide enabled.
>   This state never changes, the only thing that changes is package
> version goes up each time we branch.  13, 14, 15, etc...

How about just have fedora-release contain only the rawhide
repo, and have 'Obsoletes: fedora-release-rawhide < %{version}'?


More information about the devel mailing list