fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 17:01:45 UTC 2010


On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:42 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating at redhat.com) said: 
> > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 16:29 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or
> > > worse?
> > 
> > I muffed up fedora-release on rawhide, but here was my plan.
> > 
> > rawhide:
> >   fedora-release requires fedora-release-rawhide
> >   All repos except for rawhide disabled.  Rawhide enabled.
> >   This state never changes, the only thing that changes is package
> > version goes up each time we branch.  13, 14, 15, etc...
> 
> How about just have fedora-release contain only the rawhide
> repo, and have 'Obsoletes: fedora-release-rawhide < %{version}'?
> 
> Bill

That might work, but would cause me some more shuffling each time I
branch the master for a Fedora release.  What's the net positive gain
here?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/e8ed42ea/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list