FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Feb 26 17:07:24 UTC 2010

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 17:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Can you expand on "must be tested"?
> Some test updates just don't get any testing.
> Audacity 1.3.10-beta
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13139
> (2009-12-09 to 2010-01-26)
> Audacity 1.3.11-beta
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-0968
> (since 2010-01-24) 

It'll require some enhancements to how bodhi is used for people
consuming testing updates, and it may require a more active role on part
of the maintainer to seek out somebody to at least give the update a
smoke test.  Instead of treating updates-testing users as a black box
that you may or may not get any output from, we should have a more
direct relationship.  Maybe something in the Fedora Engineering Services
initiative could be to spend some time smoke testing updates-testing

Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/7d43d14b/attachment.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list