fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.
opensource at till.name
Fri Feb 26 18:31:46 UTC 2010
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:12:53PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 17:14 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:29:31PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > New:
> > > yum --releasever=<next> upgrade
> > >
> > > Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or worse?
> > Is the releasever option a yum F13 feature? On F12 it complains that
> > it is not a valid option.
> > Also repoquery returns F12 results but accepts --releasever:
> > $ repoquery --releasever=rawhide --repoid=fedora kernel
> > kernel-0:126.96.36.199-127.fc12.x86_64
> Yes, it's a 3.2.26+ feature. It's likely that F12 will get a yum update
> eventually ... and you can get a 3.2.26+ yum from rawhide now. So for
> ideas about changing how rawhide works, that's not a big requirement is
Yes, it is not a big requirement. Nevertheless I can wonder why it does
not work in repoquery, even though it is in the --help output. So if it
is expected not to work, it is imho a bug in repoquery to say that it
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/9e9e18ef/attachment.bin
More information about the devel