FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Sat Feb 27 01:28:37 UTC 2010
Adam Williamson wrote:
> This is simply bad faith. I have seen absolutely no suggestion that the
> policy would be put out in such a way, and I can't see any basis you
> have to infer that. The suggestion that a draft version of the policy
> would be provided for feedback is not at all the same thing as what you
> wrote above. As long as the policy was properly adjusted (or abandoned)
> based on the feedback it received, what objection do you have?
The fact that the vote with no clear policy at all was dangerously close to
a 5:1 pass (in fact, as far as I can tell, if all the members who had
previously approved of a similar proposal in the somewhat chaotic discussion
had reiterated their +1, we'd have had something like 5 or 6 +1 votes) and
that this was only stopped at the very last moment when mjg59 volunteered to
write up a precise policy.
At that point, the vote got deferred for 1 week, but after almost half of
that time elapsed, I still haven't seen any draft policy, request for
Isn't it natural that this leaves me really worried about what's going to
happen on Tuesday?
More information about the devel