FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at
Sat Feb 27 01:28:37 UTC 2010

Adam Williamson wrote:
> This is simply bad faith. I have seen absolutely no suggestion that the
> policy would be put out in such a way, and I can't see any basis you
> have to infer that. The suggestion that a draft version of the policy
> would be provided for feedback is not at all the same thing as what you
> wrote above. As long as the policy was properly adjusted (or abandoned)
> based on the feedback it received, what objection do you have?

The fact that the vote with no clear policy at all was dangerously close to 
a 5:1 pass (in fact, as far as I can tell, if all the members who had 
previously approved of a similar proposal in the somewhat chaotic discussion 
had reiterated their +1, we'd have had something like 5 or 6 +1 votes) and 
that this was only stopped at the very last moment when mjg59 volunteered to 
write up a precise policy.

At that point, the vote got deferred for 1 week, but after almost half of 
that time elapsed, I still haven't seen any draft policy, request for 
feedback etc.

Isn't it natural that this leaves me really worried about what's going to 
happen on Tuesday?

        Kevin Kofler

More information about the devel mailing list