FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Sat Feb 27 03:50:45 UTC 2010
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:22:37PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Maybe some package rating included in PackageKit would be nice - for
> > stable packages it's indicator that this package is worth to install, for
> > testing package it would mean it's working (but again - who's going to
> > rate it in pkgkit once installed).
> That won't solve the problem that people aren't using updates-testing in the
> first place. We can't force them to.
I had a fair (i.e. non-zero) response to my call for testing this
How'd it happen? I commented directly in the Bugzilla bugs with the
link and told the subscribers to the bugs that the package would not
be issued until some of them tested it and posted feedback to tell me
their bugs were fixed.
That's a lot harder to do if you maintain hundreds of packages, sure.
So we ought to have some more visible and helpful automations:
* A notification mechanism for people who have a package installed
that has known bugs. The notification mechanism should "pleasantly
coerce" the user to test, but letting them know we can't promise it
will work. If it doesn't, our tools should be able to undo that
transaction gracefully -- start from current updates, try test, if
failing 'yum history undo' back to current update.
* The Bugzilla comments that Bodhi sends probably need some work.
They're currently very complete and factual but they don't include
any information for the less experienced users who are often filing
bugs. Those people have reached out to contribute something, they
want to continue that engagement (i.e. get a fix), and we could have
a mutually positive exchange with them. By not giving them clear
information we're putting that opportunity at risk.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
More information about the devel