ABRT considered painful

[Seth Vidal]

On Sat, 2 Jan 2010, Jan Kratochvil wrote:

> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:34:47 +0100, drago01 wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil
>> <jan.kratochvil at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:53:28 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>>> the only problem I know about is when some of the enabled repositories is
>>>> down - then the yum fails to download debuginfo even if it's in working
>>>> directory and there is not much ABRT can do about this.
> ...
>> Well this "yum issue" is by design .. reporting it does not have much
>> sense because Seth do not want to change/fix it.
>
> Found this flameware at this open Bug:
> 	https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528014

What flames? I said no and that - if abrt wants to do otherwise 
they can use the yum api to do so.

How is that a flame?

-sv