Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 17:24 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:12:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:00 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > 
> > > xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11.src.rpm
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511425
> > 
> > This one also has a major policy breach issue:
> > 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555836
> > 
> > (it ships its own copy of xerces)
> 
> A new maintainer has stepped up and I've been working with him so he
> can get
> this bug fixed up as well.  Hopefully we'll get this package will be
> ship
> shape soon.

It'd be good to explain that on the bug reports, so we know the package
shouldn't be blocked.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net