ABRT frustrating for users and developers
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sun Jan 17 11:36:03 UTC 2010
Le samedi 16 janvier 2010 à 15:09 -0500, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Users have to provide information
> about what they were doing, copies of input files, etc etc just the
> same as in a manually-initiated bug report.
IMHO the big plus of abrt is it triggers even when the user is not
giving his full attention to the app and not checking what it does
exactly when it crashes (typical example is multitasking and doing stuff
in 3-4 apps when one dies). There is a huge class of crashes that were
not reported before because the user had no idea what the app was doing
exactly when it crashed and could not reproduce it with debuginfo later.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100117/3f2b4947/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list