Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 20:24 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> So that means that for example for the openoffice.org-dict-cs_CZ package
> I'll get the nag bug report before each and every Fedora release?
> 
> It is definitely not 4. however 1. and 2. apply to it. As this is just a
> czech spelling and hyphenation dictionary which is pretty good one and
> we do not have any alternative anyway I do not think that 2. matters
> much.
> 
> OK, I think my next changelog entry in the .spec will be something
> like: 
> - rebuilding just for the sake of not getting a nonsense bug report
>   opened against the package 

Yet, this package still gets built nearly once a year, sometimes twice a
year, due to changes in the distribution.  You may not be doing the
builds, but the package is getting touched and built.

Can the drama please.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100118/d63bb3c7/attachment.bin