Orphaning Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

[Till Maas]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:42:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:48:25 +0100
> Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:39:54 +0100
> > > Till Maas <opensource at till.name> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > Indeed. I don't see much activity from them. 
                                                 ^^^^  
> > > > > Have you tried sending them an email? 
                                 ^^^^
> > > > > If not, I can.
> > > > 
> > > > No, please go ahead.
> > > 
> > > I took the liberty right after I posted. 
> > 
> > Did also contact the recordmydesktop maintainer?
> 
> I didn't then, but I did just now. 
> 
> (Of course that meant I had to send two emails... perhaps next time you
> could just mail them directly? :) 

You offered to write both of them and I agreed afaics. Nevertheless I
did not mail them directly, because I hoped the full situation could be
resolved in some clean way, e.g. just perform a non responsive
maintainer procedure on all affected maintainers at once instead of all
these quick actions that leave a lot of confusion. Nevertheless, it is
too late now, anyhow.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100127/1a15be2c/attachment.bin