concept of package "ownership"

[Jesse Keating]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/6/10 2:16 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> Maybe Fedora should do a transition to a more open system, since the dedicated
> packager is less present nowadays. But it should be done carefully, in order
> not to piss off the remaining dedicated packagers, who are those who deliver, 
> in my opinion, the packages with highest quality.

The "system" is fairly open with regard to just about everything except
attitude.  Currently it's mostly attitude that prevents "openness".

- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwzW1IACgkQ4v2HLvE71NUGigCgkVZUzkxqfhhcS95PbwEpjLxz
9noAn2c7LTeD2CWs6QNhxezm+rXaC07L
=RNzg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----