depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)

[Till Maas]

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:25:01AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 10:21 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > Essentially using a different flag is just re-using the code used to
> > flag a package as critpath-approved only with a different name.
> > Therefore it should not need that much more effort.
> 
> critpath approved is based on karma as well, so I'm not sure what you're
> suggesting here.

I thought it is its own field in the database, because according to the
current policy it is not supposed to change once it was true. But yes,
the current implementation did not help that much here, but the patch in
the other mail shows how it can be done.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100706/0afe337b/attachment.bin