Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs

[James Laska]

On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:03 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 7/7/10 1:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I can think of one quick and simple way of doing this.
> > 
> > When we review a bug and accept it on the blocker list, we use a keyword
> > of "ACCEPTED" or some such.  That way any bug without the word is
> > assumed to just be proposed and not yet accepted.  A bit more manual
> > work and a bit harder to query, but it still nets the result of
> > differentiating between bugs that are proposed and bugs that are
> > accepted blockers.
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> And I see that this was one of the suggestions, which I didn't read
> before firing off this email.  Sorry.

No worries!  IMO that reinforces that such a solution might not be a
horrible option for F-14.

Thanks,
James

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100707/4ef85974/attachment.bin