Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

[Björn Persson]

Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> There is actually a benefit to having the subpackage name be part of the
> license location, in situations where the independent subpackage name
> significantly differs from the basename of the source package, it is
> easier for someone not versed in RPM to locate the applicable license
> texts while traversing /usr/share/doc/ .

Another way would be to have symbolic links named after the subpackages, 
pointing to the directory named after the source package.

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100712/11ad7d1a/attachment.bin