Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Christopher Brown <snecklifter at gmail.com> said:
> Whilst I appreciate your huge efforts to provide users with a more
> secure system, you need to realise that SELinux as it stands at the
> moment is utterly broken.

It works for a lot of people, so I would hardly call it "utterly
broken".

> I understand wanting SELinux checks for *EL but for Fedora? Seriously?

Since the major security risk is at the desktop, and Fedora is more
targeted at the desktop than RHEL, SELinux is IMHO more important in
Fedora than RHEL.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams at hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.