Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
kklic at redhat.com
Tue Jul 13 16:42:16 UTC 2010
On 07/13/2010 06:03 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> This is why I'm so surprised to see gpg be deprecated in f13. Upstream
> is supporting both and the manpage even indicates that the binary should
> be gpg2.
> I don't see any reason for it to have been removed in f13, and am
> willing to help maintain it.
We could also ask original maintainers of gnupg, if they are willing to
> I've been a pgp and gpg user since the
> early 90's, I attempted to port pgp to the Atari ST (unsuccessfully I
> should note :) ) at one time.
> - --
> Brian C. Lane<bcl at redhat.com>
> Red Hat / Port Orchard, WA
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the devel