Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

Karel Klic kklic at redhat.com
Tue Jul 13 16:47:47 UTC 2010


On 07/13/2010 05:52 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Having gpg1 and gpg2 seems reasonable to me.
>
> Note, though, that the problem is slightly more limited in scope.  At least
> with vim, if you have an X display, gpg2 will invoke the graphical pinentry
> where you can enter your passphrase and go about your business.

It's the same with Emacs.

> Plain console, remote sessions that are not allowed to send the graphical
> window back to the local session, and systems that don't have the graphical
> pinentry programs installed will all experience this problem, though.

Yes, exactly.



More information about the devel mailing list