[HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Wed Jul 14 20:30:56 UTC 2010


On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 14.07.10 13:16, Adam Williamson (awilliam at redhat.com) wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:09 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > 
> > > > 6. plymouth interactions
> > > 
> > > There's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614245 which
> > > currently is an issue when using plymouth in conjunction with
> > > systemd. Ray promised to look into this every day now ;-)
> > 
> > Plymouth is the default, so if you make systemd the default, almost
> > everyone is going to be using plymouth in conjunction with systemd. If
> > that's currently broken, I don't really think it makes sense to flip the
> > switch on systemd.
> 
> Well, it's not as broken that your system won't boot up. All that
> happens is that you will get a text bootup instead of a graphical
> one. Not a big deal. But yes, this should be fixed. And it is probably
> even very easy to fix it. But nothing that should stop us from flipping
> the switch now.

Ah, OK, that seems alright then.

Did you see the post a while back from someone who tried systemd and
found it wouldn't boot their system? Just curious. I will try this
myself later today.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list