[HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Lennart Poettering]

On Wed, 14.07.10 13:30, Adam Williamson (awilliam at redhat.com) wrote:

> 
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Wed, 14.07.10 13:16, Adam Williamson (awilliam at redhat.com) wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:09 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > 6. plymouth interactions
> > > > 
> > > > There's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614245 which
> > > > currently is an issue when using plymouth in conjunction with
> > > > systemd. Ray promised to look into this every day now ;-)
> > > 
> > > Plymouth is the default, so if you make systemd the default, almost
> > > everyone is going to be using plymouth in conjunction with systemd. If
> > > that's currently broken, I don't really think it makes sense to flip the
> > > switch on systemd.
> > 
> > Well, it's not as broken that your system won't boot up. All that
> > happens is that you will get a text bootup instead of a graphical
> > one. Not a big deal. But yes, this should be fixed. And it is probably
> > even very easy to fix it. But nothing that should stop us from flipping
> > the switch now.
> 
> Ah, OK, that seems alright then.
> 
> Did you see the post a while back from someone who tried systemd and
> found it wouldn't boot their system? Just curious. I will try this
> myself later today.

I think I have responded to all mails and bugzilla bugs. Or have I
missed something?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.